UltraBanner

 

Main Index of Articles

 

 

OBSERVATIONS FROM SHANGHAI: The Republicans Will Not Save US

Between Two Ossified Ideologies, American Middle Class Faces Managed Decline

Originally posted on Facebook, from Shanghai, on July 21, 2001

By Marco Antonio Roberts

 

Over the last few months, if not years, I have watched, read, and listened at the barrage of news reporting and opining that is so plentiful, on what ails our country - hoping to find, at last, that new insight heretofore absent from all public discussion as to where the answer lies to our country’s worsening economic, and ultimately national security, conditions.  I have not found it.  Instead, I have only seen again and again the same boilerplate solutions that have been offered by the opposing parties for decades now – and now often offered even more simplistically and crudely ideologically than ever.

 

From the declared (and not) Republican presidential candidates, conservative and neo-con editorialists, and entertainment news conservative pundits, we have what amounts to this (but redoubled): Go back to the Bush years.

 

We Did That Already

As a morally and economically centrist conservative I am no Obama supporter, and reject most of his ideologically leftist principles of governance.  Moreover, even many Obama supporters are beginning to openly worry about the president’s ability to lead us out of what appears to be an inexorable, if slow, descent into third world conditions.  Yet, when it comes to Republican proposals, I have to agree with one thing the president has said:  “We already did that.”  It was, after all, during and after eight years of Bushian policies that we had two economic crises, first with the dot-com bubble implosion, then the housing boom collapse. And while it is true there was also the government intrusion into, and distortion of, the market place, strongly supported and advanced by liberal Democrats like Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, much of that was also done with tacit, under-the-table Republican approval.

 

It was also during the Bush years that we had an acceleration of the transfer of wealth from the American middle class to the shores of Shanghai and Dubai; it was during those years when American technological advantages further eroded or were co-opted by our likeliest and most dangerous future rivals; and it was then that the failure to plan for a vitally important American presence in space occurred, leaving us, as of 5:57 AM EDST today, vulnerable to political blackmail to a regime run by a former KGB agent, a regime that has not been friendly to the U.S., one that cut gas supplies to European countries in the middle of a harsh winter for political gain, and has in recent years openly invaded other countries with brutal force.

 

A Well-Traveled Road

People need to understand that the freedom and prosperity we enjoy today, which is still plentiful, did not come by anything we are doing today.  It exists only because of what was done before by our predecessors.  Still, it is very difficult for people who have grown up in relative prosperity and comfort to understand that, even if that prosperity was not personal, but societal.  Maybe that is why great corporations and empires always eventually fall.  But, if we cannot get the American working people, especially the young, to peel their eyes and ears away from Snooki and Gaga, and get serious – and educated – now, about the nation’s future (not just their own personal careers), then we will follow the great nations of the past all too closely, and our legacy will be disgrace.

 

I categorically say now, with the confidence of a student of history with some empirically demonstrated logical reasoning and predictive capabilities, that with the way our economy and political discourse is structured now, we can look forward to the continuation of the decades-long decline of the American middle class, and a creeping upward expansion of that decline into the upper middle classes, along with loss of technological and military might that will inevitably follow.  And, with the loss of security that might provides, we can further expect a serious threat to our liberty and the prospects for future advancement that we have enjoyed as a nation since the founding of our republic.

 

The reasons are many, but for now, if you will permit me, let me suggest three things:

 

·         This is not the end of history.  All systems of government and trade must be substantively reformed from time to time because a subset of highly motivated human beings always eventually find a way to game the system for their own advantage, at the expense of others.  The Republicans (is anyone?) are not offering any truly new approaches to re-establishing employment and wage gains at the individual level on the main streets of America.  Instead, they seem to perpetually assume (against obvious and persistent evidence), that as long as the rich and the corporations do well, so will everyone else.  It’s true that those at the top, and the corporations they run, need to do well for the rest to prosper, but it does not follow that we will all automatically prosper when those at the top do well.  The last 20 years prove that.  As the very rich have gotten richer and richer, the rest of us, on average, have lost ground.  (Many Americans on the losing end don’t notice it because they are looking at their own circumstances, and only in current dollars.  But you can’t compare your gains at age 45 to what they were at 35, with today’s dollars at the dollars you earned ten years ago.  Instead, you have to look at what a 45 year-old in your same career and circumstances earned ten years ago, compared to what you make today in inflation-adjusted dollars.)  A radical change may now be in order, the kind that has reinvented past great nations, allowing them to extend their years of progress and prosperity.  Exhibit A: China.

 

·         Corporations are amoral things.  They are not persons.  Corporations should be treated and considered for nothing more than what they are: a vehicle for maximizing and funneling profits.  While they may not necessarily be intentionally destructive actors, they are amoral ones.  And, just as they have provided a basis for prosperity, they also have a long record of justifying every abuse of individuals, disregard of public welfare, destruction of cultural and natural landmarks, and despoiling of the environment, with one clearly and openly stated rationale: “we have a responsibility to maximize profit for our shareholders.”  I think it is safe to say that all the great philosophical and religious traditions that have mused about the elevation of the human experience, from Plato to Buddha to Confucius to Christ, would have a problem with such a single-minded approach to decision-making on issues that inevitably affect a nation’s culture and socio-economic welfare.  Nevertheless, it reigns over much of our public life.  Ergo, vulgarity, misogynism, crude self-promotion, self-centered immodesty, political extremism, are all promoted (and spread) because it is profitable to do so.  Historical landmarks are destroyed, and shoddy new buildings are put in their place because these maximize shareholder profits.  American and European conglomerates sell vital technology to our potential future adversaries, including military and population surveillance technology (as they are doing even now) because it makes money.  And these are the legal things corporations do.  It is also why American corporations are squeezing wages and outsourcing jobs on the middle to lower rungs of the labor market even as they inflate their own executive salaries at a ratio to the average worker that is 900% higher than it was back in 1980.  Now, are these executives today intellectual X-Men ten times smarter than their counterparts in 1980?  Have they produced an economic juggernaut that has produced unprecedented benefits to Americans at all levels?  Or have they merely used their privileged positions, as so many have before, to consistently arrogate to themselves, thru ups and downs alike, an ever greater portion of the nation’s wealth?

 

·         CEOs are bleeding dry the middle class.  An economy is, at its core, about the trade of goods and services; that is, the movement of value or income.  From one day to the next, we can move from boom to recession, even though we have the same number of able-bodied workers, the same amount of capital goods, and the same infrastructure.  So what is different?  The flow of value.  When the butcher stops trading with the blacksmith, who then stops trading with the farmer, who then stops visiting the local saloon - at that moment the total amount of hams, anvils, crops, and beer has not changed, and neither has the productive capacity.  But, if the flow of value, i.e. trade, does not resume soon, each will stop producing, or produce less, then resulting in a real decline in total wealth.  Well, what has been happening in our corporate economy, we have had a constriction of the wealth flowing back to the middle class, in the form of reduced employment and wages. While the flow of income has not stopped, it has been reduced in one direction as it has been accelerated in the other.  Short-term, each company and its top officers, and some many of its large shareholders, may derive increased wealth.  But in the economic ‘biosphere,’ eventually the employee/consumer base is bled dry, and the flow finally stops, with catastrophic consequences for the economy and all caught within it without the resources to escape.  This is what has begun to happen in the last two traumatic recessions, and will only get worse if a more balanced flow of income is not restored.

 

Greed Is NOT Good

The sad truth is that while Democrats still ignore many fundamentals of economics, and think that all you have to do to provide benefits and goods to all is simply wave a legislative magic wand and utter an incantation like “let there be healthcare for all,” Republicans appear closer than ever to the caricature of them the Democrats so often portray: as Pollyanna corporate boosters, for whom corporate profit is a goal that trumps all others, and with nothing new to offer.  Obama is proposing to raise taxes for “struggling” families earning only $250,000 and up, say the Republicans, including all the presidential candidates.  “Struggling?” Really? At $250K a year?  Considering that the vast majority of American middle class households manage well on less than half that, this is nothing but demagogic pandering to the ambitious class.  But, in the book of most humans across the earth, not being able to buy the latest, fully equipped Lexus, or go on that fourth trans-Atlantic vacation, or attend that $500 a plate gala, or send your kid to Harvard - in the midst of an economic retrenchment that is hitting most people hard - that is not considered “struggling.”  Struggling is being out of work for two years, not knowing how you will survive when the unemployment benefits run out.  Struggling is losing your $150K house because you can’t even afford that modest home.  Struggling is not having enough to eat, not having any good educational or employment prospects, and not being able to see a doctor at all except in an emergency room.    And, struggling is where more Americans are today than ten years ago, and where more will be in ten more years, if the executive class is allowed to continue to profess “greed is good!” as they amass greater wealth in a faltering economy.

 

A Decline Profitable for the Few

Traveling around Shanghai I am amazed by what the Chinese have accomplished.  But, as I am encouraged for their future, I am frightened for ours.  We have stopped building great new buildings, bridges, and transportation systems to advance the nation’s infrastructure, as nations east rocket past us with American money. We have surrendered our supremacy in space, and transferred our technological prowess to Chinese firms run by China’s army in exchange for short-term profits, giving them spying tools that they can use on their own people, and maybe eventually us:  We have debased our cultural norms and ideals that value civic duty, self-restraint, and national consciousness because these are boring, and aren’t as profitable to promote as people willing to degrade themselves and others in exchange for the tiniest bit of fame.  And we have, in empirically measurable ways, gone economically backwards for the majority of American people.  And yet, with all this, the executive and governing classes are doing well for themselves - in fact, hugely better than ever, while the infotainment chattering ‘punderatti,’ all of them fabulously wealthy by the same system, look the other way.  It is time to raise our heads, see, and prepare for what is coming.  Ignore it, and we all, but especially your children and your grandchildren, are destined for a gradual national decline, and the loss of freedom that must go with it, managed very profitably by a self-selected few.

 

cid:image005.jpg@01CAC6B8.A00C6750

 

Main Index of Articles

Copyright 2011, The Ultrapolis Project

May be used freely with proper attribution.  All other rights reserved.